|
COACHING - TO BE ADDED SHORTLY
***
Judging
CLUB JUDGE
The Club Judge Award is the entry level
into the B.G. (Trampoline) Judging scheme and is open to any member of B.G. who
is interested in judging and competitions.
Regulations
- Minimum Age 15
- B.G. Associate Membership is required,
Full Membership is also valid.
- Course duration (minimum): 12 hours,
includes 2 short examinations.
Syllabus
- Competition Structure & Procedures
- Recording of Individual & Team
competitions
- Form Judging
- Relevant Competition Rules
Examination
- Theory Paper: 10 Questions covering the
syllabus. Duration 30 minutes. Pass mark 60%.
- Practical Examination Form Judge 5
routines below 3.0 difficulty. Pass mark 60%.
Successful Completion
Qualified as Execution Judge at Grade 5 competitions in Great Britain.
Can be selected for Execution Judge at Grade 4 as part of development.
Code Of
Practice
Judges are representatives of British
Gymnastics and are therefore expected to maintain high standards.
Expectations
- Judges are expected to:
- Arrive prepared and in good time.
- Advise the competition organiser if
they are unable to fulfil any of their commitments.
- Behave courteously at all times.
- Refrain from alcohol abuse both before
and during the competition.
- Be in place at the specified time(s).
- Judge impartially.
- Concentrate on the task they have been
assigned.
- Complete the Judge attendance form.
- Be supportive of British Gymnastics.
Uniform
- Navy Blue Blazer
- White Blouse / Shirt & B.G. tie
- Grey Skirt / Trousers
- Black Shoes
Juries
COMPETITION JURY
- Chair of Judges panel
- Execution Judges
- Difficulty Judges
- Synchronisation Judges
- Assistant Judges
If a Judge fails to carry out his duties
in a satisfactory manner he must be replaced. This decision is made by the
Arbitration Jury upon the recommendation of the Chair of Judges panel.
ARBITRATION JURY
- 2 Members of the Organising Committee;
- The Chair of Judges panel of the event
involved;
- 2 Judges of the event involved.
The composition of the Arbitration Jury
must be declared prior to the start of the competition by the Competition
Director.
The Chair of Judges panel is President of
the Arbitration Jury and has a casting vote in the event of ties.
The Arbitration Jury will decide about the
replacement of a Judge.
Duties
EXECUTION (or FORM) JUDGE
Evaluate the execution in the range 0.0 to
1.0 points and write down their deductions on the deduction sheets.
Subtract their deductions from the maximum
mark indicated by the Chair of Judges panel.
When instructed display the resultant mark
simultaneously with the other Execution Judges.
Execution Deductions:
Deductions for execution (lack of form,
consistency of height and control in each skill) are in the range 0.0 to 0.5
points for each move considered part of the routine.
Required Positions:
- Depending on the requirements of the
movement, the body should be tucked, piked or straight.
- The arms should be straight and/or held
close to the body whenever possible.
- In all positions (except straddle
jumps), the feet and legs should be kept together and the feet and toes
pointed.
- [During the straddle jump, the feet
must be at least shoulder width apart.]
- In the tucked position the hands should
touch the legs below the knees (except in the twisting phase of multiple
somersaults).
- In the tucked and piked positions the
thighs should be close to the upper body (except in the twisting phase of
multiple somersaults).
- Deductions for lack of stability on or
after the last skill:
- EITHER landing on both feet but lacking
stability and not standing still for 3 seconds, in the range 0.1 to 0.2
points
- OR in the range of 0.3 to 1.0 points on
the instruction of the Chair of Judges panel
- Additional deductions for infringement
of other rules (also on the instruction of the Chair of Judges panel) in the
range 0.1 to 1.0 points.
Deductions
Responsibility of the Form Judges
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| Landing upright on both
feet but lacking stability and not standing still for 3 seconds (a single
deduction for the greater fault only) |
0.1-0.2 pts |
| Make the following
deductions on the instruction of the Chair of Judges panel:
|
|
| Touching the bed with one
or both hands |
0.4 pts |
Touching the bed with the
knees or hands & knees
Falling to seat, front or back
Touching the springs, pads, frame or end deck |
0.6 pts |
| Landing/falling on the
the springs, pads, frame, spotter mat or safety platform |
0.8 pts |
| Landing/falling outside
the area of the trampoline |
1.0 pt |
| Additional deductions on
the instruction of the Chair of Judges panel: |
|
| Not landing
simultaneously on both feet |
Termination |
| Exceeding the time limit |
0.1-0.3 pts |
| Talking to or giving any
form of signal to a competitor by their own spotters or coach during the
routine, for each occurrence |
0.3 pts |
Intermediate (straight)
jumps in a Voluntary routine, for each jump.
(Where this maximum Penalty applies no execution deduction for the jump is
given.) |
1.0 pts |
| Additional skills |
1.0 pt |
| |
|
| Applying to Grades 1 and
2 : U18 / O18 Men & Ladies, specifically to Compulsory Routines. |
|
| Performing a different
move from specified |
0.1 pts |
| Failing to complete
compulsory elements |
1.0 pts |
| Performing a repeat move |
1.0 pts |
| |
|
Protests
- Protests are available as a means of
appealing against possible errors in decisions. The process described here
is unique to Great Britain.
- Process:
- The protest fee should be publicly
announced before the competition start and is usually not less than three
times the entry fee.
- A Protest can only be handled in by an
official representative of a Federation (team manager, competitor or coach).
- The written protest, with the protest
fee, must be handed to the Chair of Judges panel prior to the start of the
next round. In the case of a protest concerning the final round, the protest
must be submitted immediately after the end of the round. In any case, no
protest can be accepted after the medals have been awarded.
Scope:
- Protests concerning the execution and
synchronised scores can only be made in respect of a numerical error.
- Protests must be dealt with by the
Arbitration Jury prior to the start of the next round and their decision
announced immediately.
- The decision of the Arbitration Jury is
Final and must be abided by.
- If the protest is sustained the fee
will be returned. If the protest is overruled, the fee will be retained by
the organiser.
- Protests may be made on any safety rule
in the normal way.
FIG Tie Break Rules
After Preliminaries (Set & Vol) -
Individual Competitions (FIG Code of Points 2001).
- Total Vol Mark (Including Tariff)
- Total Vol Form Mark (3 counting Judges
- No tariff)
- Total Vol Form all 5 Judges
- Total Vol Form Highest 4 Judges
- Total Vol Form Highest 3 Judges
- Total Vol Form Highest 2 Judges
- The Highest Judges Form Mark in the
Voluntary Routine
There is no Tie Break after Sets, only
after Set & Vols
There is no provision in the new FIG
Code of Points 2001 for Tie Breakers with all THREE Rounds to Count. The
SWESCORE Program uses the existing Tie Break rules of the FIG Code of Points
2000.
Tie Break after Finals with all 3
Rounds to Count (FIG Code of Points 2000)
- The Best Vol Score in the Final Round
(Including Tariff)
- The Competitor with the highest ranking
after Set & Vol.
Tie Break - Finals - With Scores
returned to Zero (FIG Code of Points 2001)
- Total Form Mark (3 counting Judges - No
tariff) in the Final Routine
- Total Form Scores all 5 Judges in Final
Routine
- Total Form Highest 4 Judges in the
Final Routine
- Total Form Highest 3 Judges in the
Final Routine
- Total Form Highest 2 Judges in the
Final Routine
- The Highest Judges Form Mark in the
Final Routine
(Set & Vol) - Team Competitions
(FIG Code of Points 2001).
- Best 3 Total Vol Marks (including
Tariff)
- Best 3 Total Set Marks
- TWO Best Vol Totals
- ONE Best Vol Totals
Judging
changes - are you aware?
The
last skill!
Since
last year there have been changed to rules on how you may finish a routine.
These changes have come from tumbling
In
this sport there were so many situations in a tumble pass where the final skills
hit the landing area and immediately fell over that the tumbling people added a
rule, which basically said. If you didn’t land on your feet and achieve a
moment of stillness in a vertical position on the last skill it would not be
counted as a skill.
This
has now been applied to trampolining. Basically if a performer is doing a front
somersault at move 10 and under rotates the skill and therefore does not achieve
a vertical point the skill is not complete. Likewise but more difficult to see
if they over rotate the somersault and never stop at the vertical point before
falling over onto their face hands or front the skill has not been completed.
The routine is then marked out of nine completed skills but has no end
deduction.
Compare
this with a front somersault. which over rotates a little but lands on the feet
then the performer falls forward onto hands and knees. If there is a point where
the body was basically still in the vertical before they then fell over. The
routine is marked out of 10 with an end deduction of 0.6.
The
Chair of Judges makes this decision and yes, it all comes down to experience and
judgement. However that is why the chair of judges should be an experienced
judge. The under rotating skill is easiest to see, the over rotated one is more
difficult It’s worth looking at some end deductions and malcing a value
judgement of this just to see for yourself The bottom line is, this is the new
rule and we in BG should follow it.
The
one footed landing rule?
For
years all the rules about the termination or interruption of a routine had the
same principle running through than. This was, if a routine is interupted you
only got marks for the previous skills. You didn’t get marks for the skill
when the interruption occurred. This applied to all situations ie if the
performer at grade 5 level had to do a pike jump at move 6 of their compulsory
routine and when they did the routine they missed out that skill the routine
would stop at that point and the performer would only be marked out of 5
correctly performed skills. Logical thought
you get marks until it goes wrong! All except the one footed landing
rule. For some reason if you did a one footed landing... say. back drop (7) half
twist to one foot (8). In theory, skill 8 went wrong and so you shouldn’t be
marked for it. but in practice you actually received marks for skill 8 and had a
0.3 additional deduction. This was sometimes very confusing especially for
novice judges.
Now
the rule states that if a skill lands on one foot the skill will not be counted.
So the ½ twist to one foot would not be counted as part of the routine which
would then be marked out of 7 completed skills. BUT there would be no additional
deduction of 0.3 This rule now makes much more sense.
|